Index of /publications/1992/distmeas/old
S. Skogestad and E.A. Wolff, ``Controllability measures for
disturbance rejection'', Preprints IFAC workshop on Interactions
between process design and process control, London, Sept. 1992, Edited
by J.D. Perkins, Pergamon Press, 1992, 23-29 (Reprinted in 1996 in
MIC)
Abstract.
Some plants have better "built-in" disturbance rejection capabilities
than others, that is, their dynamic resilience (controllability) with
respect to disturbance rejection is better. In the paper we consider
controller independent disturbance measures for six classes of
problems:
- Open-loop disturbance sensitivity.
- Disturbance sensitivity for decentralized control.
- Disturbance sensitivity for system under partial control.
- Input magnitude for rejecting disturbances.
- Output magnitude for disturbances in the presence of input
limitations.
- Maximum disturbance range
For all six problems we obtain frequency-dependent measures, and
appropriate scaling of the variables is crucial for interpreting
these measures. In the paper we also discuss the relationship between
these measures and the Relative Disturbance Gain (RDG) of McAvoy and
coworkers and the disturbance condition number of Skogestad and
Morari.